| |
|
In this section:
Chatswood Chamber News
________________________________________________________________________
| |
|
|
Thursday
24 June 2010
Statement by
Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
I have today, on
behalf of members of the Australian
Chamber of Commerce and Industry and
the wider business community, conveyed
our congratulations to Julia Gillard
on her election and appointment as
Prime Minister of Australia, and on
Wayne Swan's election as Deputy Prime
Minister. I have reaffirmed the commitment
of ACCI and the wider business community
to working with the Australian Government
and its political leadership on our
economic, workplace and social challenges.
I have also today
expressed our thanks and gratitude
to Kevin Rudd for his leadership,
service and record of achievement
as Leader of the Labor Party since
2006 and Prime Minister since 2007,
especially during the global financial
crisis.
Prime Minister Gillard’s
expression of intent to seek community
consensus in advance of major government
decisions provides a fresh opportunity
for business input into key issues
such as energy policy and resource
industry taxation arrangements.
To minimise disruption
to governance, early decisions on
new ministerial or departmental arrangements
are desirable.
The economic, workplace
and social challenges Australia faces
warrant strong political leadership
from both government and Opposition,
and a forward-looking contest of policy
ideas.
Policies that support
the private sector, both large and
small business, together with effective
political leadership, are in the national
interest and will be the expectation
of the business community on both
Ms. Gillard and Mr. Abbott, and their
ministries and shadow ministries,
in the lead-up to the forthcoming
federal election.
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
|
Thursday
24th June 2010
195th Survey
of Industrial Trends – June
Quarter 2010
The June quarter 2010 ACCI-Westpac
Survey of Industrial Trends showed
a marked softening of manufacturers’
General Business Sentiment for the
second half of 2010, amidst softening
domestic demand projections, RBA rate
hikes in April and May, and growing
concerns over the global outlook following
the European debt crisis.
Nevertheless, the
net indicators for New Orders and
Output were well up over the June
quarter. The net Exports deliveries
indicator improved marginally over
the quarter and manufacturers are
expecting stronger export growth for
the next three months, helped by a
weaker Australian dollar. Profit Expectations
for the next 12 months have continued
to firm to well above their decade
average level. Investment Intentions
also firmed markedly, with an improvement
in planned capital expenditure for
plant and equipment and buildings
for the next 12 months.
Net Employment and
Overtime Worked indicators have remained
stable and firm at well above their
decade averages over the quarter,
albeit manufacturers are predicting
a fall in overtime worked over the
September quarter. Average Selling
Prices rose for the first time since
the December quarter of 2008 and the
pace of Average Unit Costs increases
has accelerated but remains well below
its decade average. Stronger price
and cost increases are expected over
the next three months.
Mr. Greg
Evans, Director of Economics and Industry
Policy, Australian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry, commented:
“The overall
outlook presented by the June quarter
2010 survey points towards a steady
economic recovery, albeit at a slower
pace than might have been suggested
by the previous quarter's excessively
optimistic predictions. While general
business confidence is deteriorating,
actual net outcomes for demand and
production have firmed and forward
projections by the manufacturers surveyed
in respect of their own firms remain
robust.
“Employment
indicators have remained stable, while
the softening projection for overtime
worked may indicate that more employers
intend to hire new labour rather than
relying on overtime. The pick-up in
capital investment plans for plant
and equipment, gradually firming capacity
utilisation and rising profitability
projections are also encouraging.
“Despite the
headline survey results for manufacturers
heading in the right direction, we
still consider there remains sufficient
areas of weakness in overall business
conditions to make the case for the
Reserve Bank to leave the official
interest rate unchanged in the period
ahead. Moreover, it is concerning
that further cost increases in terms
of labour and finance costs will put
further pressure on manufacturers’
profitability and sustainability.”
Mr. Bill
Evans, Chief Economist, Economics
& Research, Westpac Banking Corporation,
commented:
“This is a
surprisingly solid result. The Survey
was conducted mainly after the release
of the Federal Budget and the Government’s
response to the Henry Tax Review.
“It shows that
business conditions, as measured by
the Westpac–ACCI Actual Composite
Index, have remained strong and generally
around the levels recorded in the
March quarter. However, the excessive
optimism which we saw in the March
Survey has dissipated. In the March
Survey manufacturers were expecting
conditions to improve at a record
pace over the June quarter. In the
event, conditions improved at about
the same pace as in the March quarter.
“The more volatile
General Business Situation measure
slipped in the June quarter. Confidence
levels are now significantly below
the 15 year highs which were recorded
in the September quarter last year.
This confidence measure is a less
reliable indicator of future economic
activity than the Composite Indexes
and hence may be sending an unnecessarily
negative signal.
“It is significant
that the Westpac–ACCI Labour
Market Composite Index net balance,
which uses a range of employment indicators
to provide an assessment of conditions
in the labour market and the outlook
for employment growth, held around
last quarter’s level. That read
is consistent with our assessment
that employment growth will remain
around a 2% to 3% growth pace –
enough to gradually lower the unemployment
rate further.
“The investment
outlook firmed. There was a sharp
pick up in investment intentions,
supported by an improvement in capacity
utilisation, solid profit expectations,
and an above-trend expansionary print
of the Actual Composite Index.”
Copies of the full
Survey are available on the ACCI website
at www.acci.asn.au/SurveyACCIWestpac.htm
The ACCI-Westpac
Survey of Industrial Trends is the
longest continuous running survey
of industry in Australia, having started
in 1966.
For further information
please contact:
Greg Evans Director of Economics and
Industry Policy, ACCI (02) 6273 2311
/ 0407 204 559
Bill Evans Chief
Economist, Economics & Research,
Westpac (02) 8254 8531
Eugene Bajkowski Consulting Economist,
ACCI (02) 6273 2311 / (02) 6249 6128
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications, ACCI (03) 9668
9950 / 0407 273 884
|
| |
|
 |
23 June 2010
The NSW Business Chamber has welcomed
the further reductions in workers
compensation premium rates announced
by the NSW Government today.
“These latest reductions, estimated
to be in the order of 2.5%, will save
NSW businesses around $65 million
a year”, said Stephen Cartwright,
CEO of NSW Business Chamber.
“Over recent years we have seen
cumulative cuts in the order of 33%
for NSW businesses – providing
NSW businesses with an annual saving
in excess of $1 billion.
“NSW Business Chamber pressed
for such a cut in its pre-Budget submission,
arguing that the Scheme could afford
the cut due to its recent improved
performance.
“This further cut, along with
the cuts to payroll tax announced
in the Budget, marks another small
but important improvement in the competitiveness
of NSW businesses.
“It should be noted that this
2.5% cut is an average cut to premiums
across NSW, with businesses saving
more and some saving less.
“It is fair that the reductions
have been targeted to those industry
sectors which have been performing
best when it comes to workers compensation.
It is also important that those industry
sectors which have not received premium
reductions be told why and what they
need to do to get their tariff rates
down.
“While workers compensation
tariff rates in NSW have come down
significantly over recent years, NSW
still lags Queensland and Victoria
so there is still more work to be
done with the workers compensation
system.
“History has shown that keeping
workers compensation premiums stable
and at acceptable levels requires
constant attention. If the scheme
gets out of control it takes a long
time to bring back to order.”
NSW Business Chamber believes that
the time has come for WorkCover to
take another look at the premium system,
particularly for those smaller employers
whose premiums are experience rated.
For more information contact Paul
Ritchie on 0416 077 976 |
| |
|
 |
Thursday
3 June 2010 Today
Fair Work Australia handed down its
2010 annual wage review increasing
adult award rates by $26.00 and the
adult minimum wage by $26.12 to $569.90
(or $15.00 per hour).
The increases apply
from the first pay period starting
on or after 1 July 2010.
For many, the increases
coincide with the first phasing step
into their modern award rates which
also applies from the first pay period
starting on or after 1 July 2010.
For further information,
download the full Workplace Relations
Circular here. This circular deals
with who is affected by the decision
and its effect on classification rates,
allowances, casual loadings and modern
award phasing.
If you have questions
regarding the circular, please call
the Workplace Advice Line on 13 29
59.
|
| |
|
 |
Monday
21 June 2010
Business Council of Australia President
Graham Bradley yesterday co-hosted the
first meeting of the Australia–China
CEO Roundtable in Canberra.
The roundtable took
place during the visit of His Excellency
Vice President of the People’s
Republic of China Xi Jinping, to Australia.
The roundtable was
established to promote dialogue between
business leaders as the basis for
deepening economic cooperation, strengthening
commercial ties and broadening communication
between business and the Chinese and
Australian Governments.
The first meeting of the roundtable
was attended by 25 Australian and
Chinese business leaders from the
areas of energy, mining, resources,
financial services, professional services
and manufacturing.
A statement issued
following the roundtable can be viewed
via the following link:
http://www.bca.com.au/Content/101693.aspx
For further information, visit our
website at www.bca.com.au.
To provide feedback
or unsubscribe to the BCA email distribution
list, please click here.
|
| |
|
|
Thursday
17 June 2010
Statement by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief
Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry (ACCI), welcomes
the passing of paid parental leave
legislation by the Commonwealth Parliament
today.
“Australian
business welcomes this important taxpayer
funded social reform which will benefit
women and their families. The scheme
has strong bi-partisan and community
support and its time has well and
truly come.”
“As the representative
of more than 350,000 small businesses
across Australia; many owned and operated
by women; ACCI is disappointed that
the Government chose to ignore amendments
to the legislation proposed by the
Opposition and supported by Senators
Fielding and Xenophon which would
have seen the Government administer
parental leave payments through the
Family Assistance Office rather than
imposing this considerable burden
on small business people.”
For further information:
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763
|
| |
|
|
Friday
11 June 2010
Statement by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief
Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry, Australia's
largest and most representative business
organisation, has welcomed today's
decision by a Full Bench of Fair Work
Australia on trade union right of
entry into workplaces under the government's
new industrial relations laws.
"Today's decision
upholds the principle that entry by
union officials into private workplaces
is a conditional right that carries
responsibilities, and that union bargaining
agreements cannot water down those
conditions."
ACCI intervened in
these Fair Work Australia hearings
and asked the Full Bench to strike
down a right of entry clause in a
collective bargaining agreement which
did not comply with the conditions
set down by law. Those conditions
include union officials having to
give an employer prior notice of entry,
limits on the purposes of entry to
interviews with employees who consented,
and requirements on union officials
to comply with company health and
safety regulations when on site.
"Private workplaces
are not the public domain of union
officials, and the tribunal has done
the right thing to uphold the decision
which parliament made in 2008 to make
union entry conditional".
"ACCI does not
envisage a problem with the application
of this decision as union officials
in most sectors already respect these
sensible restrictions. The spirit
and letter of this decision needs
to be respected by those union officials
who have been trying to stretch entry
rights beyond those that the parliament
gave."
For further information:
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
|
| |
|
|
Friday
11 June 2010
Statement
by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry today renewed
calls for Australia’s banks
to make a greater effort to understand
and meet the needs of the small business
sector following the release of the
Export and Investment Corporation’s
(EFIC’s) Global Readiness Index
(GRI) yesterday.
The latest GRI highlights
the continuing difficulties faced
by Australian businesses seeking to
export and identifies the chronic
difficulty in accessing bank finance
as a key barrier to small and medium
businesses expanding their businesses
overseas.
“Australia’s
banks should step up and champion
the small business sector as it recovers
from the global financial crisis (GFC).
Given the cost pressures on SMEs,
including higher wage and labour costs;
interest rate rises and higher bank
fees; accessible finance for export
oriented small and medium businesses
is essential. This is just the moment
when SME’s need reasonable,
responsive and responsible partners
in the finance sector.”
The GRI assesses
the drivers, destinations and obstacles
encountered by Australian businesses
seeking to export. Of the nearly 1000
businesses surveyed, more than half
(58%) nominated poor access to finance
as a key barrier to expanding their
business. EFIC found that access to
bank finance was particularly difficult
for small and medium businesses.
Chronic difficulties
accessing affordable bank finance
and a fair risk assessment process
has been found by ACCI to be the most
substantial issue affecting day to
day business in the SME sector. ACCI
has made recommendations to the Senate
Economics Committee Inquiry into small
business access to finance on this
very issue.
Despite industry
calls for greater competition in the
small to medium finance market, this
competition has not been forthcoming.
In addition, despite Australian banks
ability to do so, they have failed
to exempt trade finance products from
the strict capital requirements under
the Basel II Framework.
With Australian businesses
offshore investments contributing
1.5 % to GDP, the successful globalisation
of Australian businesses offers an
important opportunity to further contribute
to Australia’s economy. The
absence of additional funding for
the Export Market Development Grants
Scheme (EMDG) in the May Budget, despite
shortfalls in pay-out amounts, has
put further pressure on exporting
businesses.
EFIC’s Global
Readiness Index is a wake-up call
Australia’s banks that their
SME customers can only contribute
to domestic and global recovery if
the finance sector becomes a more
accommodating and supportive partner.
For further information:
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763
Nathan Backhouse
Director, Trade and International
Affairs 02 6273 2311 / 0431 615 709
|
| |
|
 |
Thursday 10 June 2010
NSW’s largest business organisation,
NSW Business Chamber, said the Opposition
announcements about economic reform,
infrastructure and affordable housing
was a comprehensive package indicating
a broad economic agenda.
“It is no secret that business
had concerns about the willingness
of the NSW Opposition to undertake
a reform agenda if it were elected
in March 2011. Today’s announcements
send a clear message that the Opposition
is willing to develop an agenda that
is focused on improving government
performance, investing in infrastructure
and working on solutions to improving
Sydney’s liveability”,
said Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW
Business Chamber.
“It appears the Opposition
is intending to discard its small
target approach to policy development.
Every person interested in substantive
public policy debate in NSW will welcome
this development.
Sydney Ferries
“The decision of the NSW Government
to scuttle private sector participation
in the provision of ferry services
represented the worst in government
decision making. The decision, based
purely on placating Unions NSW, scuttled
bids that provided better ferry services
for Sydney commuters. The decision
has impacted on the willingness of
businesses to engage and participate
in Government tendering processes.
“The announcement by the Opposition
to effectively privatise Sydney Ferries
sends a clear signal about the willingness
of the Opposition to engage in meaningful
public sector reform. “Contestability
of service is needed across government
and this is a clear signal that the
Opposition will pursue this agenda.
“I hope government trading enterprises
recognise the implications of this
announcement and use it as a spur
to improve performance. Business is
not opposed to public sector enterprises
per se; we are opposed to such enterprises
not providing the community with service
levels in keeping with that provided
by the private sector.
Desalination Plant
“The Opposition’s call
to lease the Desalination Plant is
a good example of how Government can
use its assets to work for taxpayers
rather than to bind taxpayers to long-term
ownership. In principle, this is similar
to the Government’s decision
to privatise the lotteries by offering
a long-term lease.
“Importantly, the funding from
the desalination lease will be used
to invest in critical infrastructure,
putting the assets of taxpayers back
to work.
Infrastructure Fund
“The commitment of the Opposition
to put windfall tax revenues aside
for investment in infrastructure provides
additional revenue to much needed
infrastructure, but just as importantly,
creates a constraint on growth in
recurrent expenses.
“It should be noted that in
the 2008 NSW Mini-Budget, the Government
committed itself to a 2.5% cap in
employee expenses. According to the
Budget papers, employee related expenses
in 2009-10 grew by 6.6% and are forecast
to slow by 4.7% per annum over the
four years to 2013-14.
Housing Affordability “NSW
Business Chamber was very supportive
of the announcements made in the Budget
regarding housing affordability. We
support those initiatives and also
welcome the Opposition announcements
in this area.
“Housing affordability will
be the most significant business and
social issue in NSW over the coming
decade. Sydney must not end up as
a city where workers cannot afford
to live close to their workplaces.
Housing affordability impacts on workforce
participation, skill shortages and
pressure on transport and infrastructure.
“Part of the solution lies
in removing inefficiencies in the
market – such as the significant
transaction costs in downsizing. It
also lies in encouraging greater decentralisation
– and in major investments in
transport infrastructure.
“We do need to think of innovative
strategies to encourage people to
make the move to regional NSW –
and I welcome the $7,000 relocation
initiative. “For too long housing
construction policy has been focused
on demand – the time has come
to increase supply and take the pressure
off house prices.
Media Contact: Paul Ritchie 0416
077 976 |
| |
|
|
Wednesday
9 June 2010
Statement by Mr Peter Anderson,
Chief Executive
Australian business
faces a growing skills gap according
to the Australian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry’s (ACCI) Employment,
Education and Training (EET) Committee
which met in Perth today.
The predicted shortage
of 210,000 workers in Western Australia
alone over the decade was high on
the Committee’s agenda.
The Committee’s
Chair, Russell Varley said the future
workforce problems were due to a combination
of labour and skills shortages and
must be addressed by a strategic approach
to population, workforce participation
and productivity by balancing skills
development and skilled migration.
Government must also
adequately take into account the particular
circumstances faced by different industry
sectors in shaping policy.
The issue is not
just restricted to high profile industry
sectors such as resources and construction.
Service industries on both the west
and east coasts of Australia’s
are labour intensive businesses whose
productivity needs compel both business
and industry specific solutions.
Collaboration with
business and industry organisations
will be essential in mapping a way
forward to a higher skilled workforce
and greater productivity. Industry
and government will also need to work
together to better match supply and
demand.
Representatives from
ACCI’s national network of thirty
five business organisations make up
the EET Committee and ensure it has
an authentic knowledge of how labour
and skills shortages impact on business
and communities across Australia.
Growing pressures
on businesses to attract and retain
the right number of staff with the
right skills mix means firms are turning
away business and their future growth
is restricted.
"This means
lost opportunity for business, lost
opportunity for industry and lost
opportunity for communities to achieve
their full potential."
For further information:
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
|
| |
|
| |
|
 |
Wednesday 9 June 2010
NSW’s largest business organisation,
NSW Business Chamber, is encouraging
employers and their employees to start
discussing leave options for the 2010
FIFA World Cup to avoid “sickies”
from late night matches.
Match Date & Time (Aus
EST) Impact on Business
Australia V Germany Monday 14 June,
4.30am Queen’s Birthday Public
Holiday Australia V Ghana Sunday 20
June, 12am Weekend game
Australia V Serbia Thursday 24 June,
4.30am Thursday - working day
“I expect many football die-hards
will talk with their employers to
arrange leave – and for those
workplaces which operate around the
clock, I expect we will see many TVs
brought in to watch Australia triumph,”
said Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW
Business Chamber.
“Fortunately, two of the three
matches that have been scheduled so
far will fall on a public holiday
or on a Sunday morning; the third
match is an early Thursday morning
match that could see a few red-eyed
people coming into work.
“Our workplaces are becoming
more flexible and part of that flexibility,
is the ability and capacity for both
employers and employees to plan for
big events such as the World Cup.
“Whilst I expect there will
be many workers (and bosses) yawning
through the morning after World Cup
days, I don’t think we will
see much absenteeism.
“What is important is that
employers and employees detail their
expectations in relation to work performance
during the World Cup. There is a world
of difference between a few yawns
and a bad hangover.
“If you are expecting to have
a big night, then my advice is to
arrange your leave well ahead of time
so you can enjoy the game, without
putting your work and reputation at
risk.
“We should not forget that
serious workplace accidents do occur
when people are tired or have hangovers,
so we all need to take extra care
in relation to occupational health
and safety
” Mr Cartwright said he did
expect some industries in Australia
to profit from the World Cup –
retailers of plasma and flat screen
TVs, sporting apparel and memorabilia,
newspapers, coffee sellers, pubs and
clubs operating 24 hours, taxis, late
night takeaway outlets, the gaming
industry and retailers of products
associated with the Socceroos.
“The hospitality industry will
boon with the World Cup. We saw during
the last World Cup that pubs and clubs,
anywhere with a TV set, were packed
with eager football fans.”
“Sydney has also been selected
as one of only seven international
cities to host an official FIFA Fan
Fest site during the World Cup with
an expectation of up to one million
people descending on Darling Harbour
during the Cup.
“The World Cup will be good
for business provided we plan ahead.”
Media Contact: Paul Ritchie 0416
077 976 |
| |
|
 |
Tuesday
8 June 2010
NSW’s largest business
organisation, NSW Business Chamber,
said the 2010-11 Budget provided the
state with workable policies designed
to improve the long-term competitive
position of NSW. Welcomed
initiatives in the 2010-11 State Budget
include:
*Two cuts to payroll
tax – 5.5% from 1 July 2010
and 5.45% from 1 January 2011,
*Increase in payroll tax threshold
from $638,000 to $658,000 on 1 July
2010,
*Abolition of the insurance protection
tax from 1 July 2011,
*A Comprehensive Housing Supply Strategy
that will introduce zero stamp duty
for off-the-plan purchases of new
homes up to $600,000 (a potential
saving of $22,490 per home),
*A 25% stamp duty cut on newly constructed
homes,
*Zero stamp duty for over-65s who
sell their family home or downsize
to a newly constructed home worth
up to $600,000,
*An additional $40 million for the
Major Investment Attraction Scheme
to attract large ‘footloose’
projects to NSW: and
*A $75 million defence industry package.
“This is more
than an election budget – it
is actually a good Budget. It seeks
to create workable solutions to issues
around business costs, expanding housing
supply and investing in transportation
and infrastructure”, said Stephen
Cartwright, CEO of NSW Business Chamber.
“It is fair
to say that NSW has come through the
GFC better than expected. However,
there are still some clouds on the
horizon and we have to work hard to
improve the economic position of NSW.
“Treasury’s
projections for growth and jobs reflect
a strong, diversified and competitive
business sector. The GFC has highlighted
that strong and competitive local
businesses are the best antidote to
global instability.
“We welcome
the cuts to payroll tax. Payroll tax
is more than a tax on jobs, as the
Henry Review highlighted, it is also
a tax on wages. Whilst the additional
cut in January is small at 0.05%,
business recognises that the Government
has pursued a strategy of small incremental
cuts. This strategy has resulted in
NSW now having the lowest payroll
tax rate in 30 years.
“The reforms
in terms of housing supply are also
significant. The planning reforms,
changes to levies and the zero stamp
duty opportunities will encourage
the supply of new housing and will
remove some of the inefficiencies
in the current system.
“Housing affordability
has the potential to become a significant
business issue in coming years as
workers get priced out of Sydney accommodation.
This will result in skills shortages
which will increase pressure on transport
and infrastructure.
“The initiatives
in terms of the Major Investment Strategy
Scheme, and the investment in defence
jobs, highlight a more pro-active
approach by the Government in creating
new business opportunities for NSW.
These initiatives are welcome and
supported.
“We also welcome
the announcement about traineeships
and apprenticeships for young people
and we are particularly encouraged
by the announcement of new trade schools.”
Mr Cartwright said
he was disappointed that the Government
did not adopt a more aggressive approach
to regional development in NSW.
“We need to
invest further in our regional communities
by encouraging relocations and by
encouraging greater diversification
in our regional communities. NSW Business
Chamber argued for a Develop Regional
NSW Fund and we believe there is still
more to do in this area.
Mr Cartwright said
another area of concern within the
Budget was the increase in employment
costs.
“The Mini-Budget
in 2008 committed the Government to
a 2.5% cap in employee related expenses.
According to the Budget papers, employee
related expenses grew by 6.6% in 2009-10
and are forecast to grow by 4.7% per
annum over the four years to 2013-14.”
Mr Cartwright said
it should also be noted that a Budget
is exactly that – a Budget.
It is not a document that benchmarks
NSW against other jurisdictions, or
highlights areas of efficiency.
“Budgets by
their nature aren’t reforming
documents. Whilst this Budget delivers
on reducing business costs, dealing
with housing supply and invests in
infrastructure, we do believe even
more could be achieved if the Government
undertook a comprehensive reform and
audit of its own activities, work
practices and performance.
For more information
contact Paul Ritchie on 0416 077 976
|
| |
|
 |
Monday
7 June 2010
NSW’s largest business organisation,
NSW Business Chamber, has welcomed
the NSW Government’s announcement
to cut NSW’s payroll tax rate
by a further 0.05% in tomorrow’s
budget.
NSW’s payroll tax rate will
be cut from the current rate of 5.65%
to 5.5% from 1 July, six months earlier
than originally planned, and then
cut again by a further 0.05% to 5.45%
from 1 January 2011.
“These cuts
represent a $300 million reduction
in the cost of doing business in NSW,”
said Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW
Business Chamber.
“NSW is in competition with
the other states to be an attractive
place to do business – cutting
payroll tax makes NSW more competitive
with Queensland and Victoria.
NSW Business Chamber
outlined a fully-funded plan to cut
NSW’s payroll tax rate to 4.95%
by 2015 as part of its pre-election
blueprint, “10 Big Ideas to
Grow NSW”.
“Queensland
and Victoria have payroll tax rates
less than 5%. We would like to see
the NSW Government continue its campaign
to cut payroll tax beyond 2011
” Mr Cartwright
said that NSW businesses pay $1,870
in payroll tax per employee, compared
to $1,498 in Victoria.
“A lower payroll
tax rate in Victoria is an incentive
for businesses to by-pass NSW and
set up shop in Victoria. We need to
continue the drive towards a more
competitive tax rate with the other
states.” Media Contact: Paul
Ritchie 0416 077 976 |
| |
|
|
Thursday
3 June 2010
Fair Work Australia's
(FWA) decision today to increase the
minimum wage and more than one thousand
award wages by $26 per week, is irresponsible,
potentially damaging to the economy
and a stark reminder of how the centralised
wage system fails to cater for those
employers that can afford large rises
and those that can't.
"The new IR
system may have delayed the wages
blow, but when it came today, it was
so swift and harsh that many small
businesses will be left reeling.”
While a case existed
for a modest increase, this decision
goes well beyond what was responsible
or justified. It will be a dangerous
setback to economic recovery in the
small business sector. The pay rise
has no natural funding basis given
the complete absence of productivity
trade-offs.
In reality, the increase
is at least $31.20 per week after
it flows onto wage add-ons such as
leave loadings, superannuation, payroll
tax and workers compensation premiums.
ACCI estimates that
it will add $2.5 billion to the annual
wages bill of Australian small business.
Small business employers
in the slow lane of the two-speed
recovery will be dealt a severe double
blow as they also struggle with higher
penalty rates and labour cost rises
from 1 July due to the reorganisation
of awards.
"The failure
of the FWA Wages Panel to make real
allowance for employers facing this
double wages whammy means extreme
pressure on business activity and
jobs from 1 July 2010."
“This decision
cannot be implemented in less than
four weeks and will result in hundreds
of thousands of small businesses being
entangled in a red tape back pay nightmare.
This alone adds insult to injury.”
For further information:Greg
Evans Director, Economics & Industry
Policy 02 6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763 |
| |
|
 |
2 June
2010
Statement by Robert Milliner, Chair
of the BCA Business Reform Task Force,
on the Henry Taxation Review and the
Resource Super Profits Tax The
BCA has today released a statement
on the government’s response
to the Henry tax review. The proposed
Resource Super Profits Tax does not
rate well against the BCA’s
high-level principles for tax reform.
Of most concern to the BCA is the
failure of the RSPT to meet the principle
that the taxation framework be characterised
by stability and predictability, with
any change prospective so as not to
adversely affect existing investments
or create perceptions of sovereign
risk.
The government’s
response to the Henry tax review is
not the bold tax reform that was promised.
The BCA will continue to press for
tax reform that will enhance Australia’s
future prosperity.
Download the statement
here:
http://www.bca.com.au/Content/101690.aspx
For further
information, visit our website at
www.bca.com.au.
|
| |
|
|
Wednesday
2 June 2010
Statement
by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The release of the
Fair Work Ombudsman’s (FWO)
Guidance Note on transitional provisions
in modern awards makes it clear that
the cost of doing business in Australia
will increase from 1 July 2010 when
the regulatory clean-up and phasing
in of the new awards will commence.
“Australian
business will face greater costs of
employment including increased penalty
rates, allowances and changes to regulated
employment standards. These changes
will hit service industries such as
retail, hospitality and tourism, which
are major employers, particularly
hard.”
“While a reduction
in the number of awards will benefit
compliance in the long run, the resulting
increase in labour costs is totally
unacceptable and a breach of promise
by government to affected industries.”
"ACCI has previously
succeeded before a Full Bench of Fair
Work Australia in having these costs
transition over a number of years,
but the higher costs and time-consuming
calculations identified by the FWO
are cold comfort to the hundreds of
thousands of small and medium business
(SMEs) employers who are battling
to understand why it will it cost
more to employ someone when their
employee’s duties will not be
performed differently."
"Added to these
concerns is the doubt cast by the
FWO’s Guidance Note on the right
of employers to apply a general practice
of absorbing these new costs into
over-award payments, a right ACCI
and our national network of thirty
five state and territory chambers
of commerce and national industry
associations won in hearings before
Fair Work Australia last year."
“The FWO’s
active compliance activities, this
Guidance Note, the new awards and
the minimum wage decision this Thursday
all ramp up the stress of doing business
just when SMEs are recovering from
the global financial crisis and new
economic uncertainty emerges courtesy
of doubt about the creditworthiness
of some European governments, as reflected
by the Reserve Bank of Australia’s
decision not to increase official
interest rates today.”
“Chambers of
Commerce and Industry Associations
are sources of trusted advice and
expertise to help employers navigate
these new obligations.
For further information:
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763
|
| |
|
|
Tuesday
1 June 2010
Statement by Greg Evans,
Director, Economics & Industry
Policy
The Reserve Bank
of Australia’s (RBA) decision
to leave official interest rates unchanged
is a reprieve for the Australian economy,
business and consumers.
“There is no
doubt that the uneven recovery of
the Australian economy from the global
financial crisis (GFC) and the emergence
of new financial uncertainties as
a result of doubts about the credit
worthiness of some European governments
justifies the RBA’s decision
to end its current phase of monetary
policy tightening.”
“Indeed, there
is a strong case for the RBA to sit
out the winter on interest rates and
not contemplate an increase for at
least three months to help rebuild
momentum and confidence in the economy.”
“A winter sabbatical
from interest rate rises would mean
that the RBA was supporting the more
than 420,000 small and medium enterprises
(SME’s) which are at the sharp
end of the economy and have recently
endured successive rate increases
while adjusting to the phasing out
of government stimulus measures.”
“Vital industries
such as retail, hospitality and tourism
are particularly sensitive to subdued
consumer demand and would particularly
benefit from a longer reprieve from
rate rises.”
“It must be
remembered that SME’s in these
and other industry sectors are the
engine room of the economy.”
For further information:
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763
Greg Evans Director,
Economics & Industry Policy 02
6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
|
| |
|
 |
Tuesday
1st June
Statement
by Blake Briggs, Senior Workplace
Policy Advisor
Fair Work Australia's
Minimum Wage Panel will hand down
its first National Wage Review decision
at 11 am Thursday 3 June 2010. NSW
Business Chamber will be providing
a summary of the decision and its
application to modern awards generally
immediately following the decision.
Recipients of NSW
Business Chamber's Award Loose Leaf
Service will receive updated pay summaries,
which will include updated allowances,
shortly following the decision.
Transitional Arrangements
FWO Guidance Note
The Fair Work Ombudsman
has released a Guidance Note relating
to the model transitional arrangements
in modern awards. The Guidance Note
is targeted at industrial relations
practitioners. Consequently, we suggest
members receiving industrial services
from NSW Business Chamber and those
who use the
Transitional Arrangements FWO Guidance
Note also contact the Workplace Advice
Unit on 13 29 59.
Guidance Note also
contact the Workplace Advice Unit
on 13 29 59.
|
| |
|
|
Tuesday
1 June 2010
Statement by
Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The reality that
the transition to modern awards means
increased costs of employment, including
increased penalty rates, allowances
and changes to regulated employment
standards particularly in service
industries is dawning on employers
today with the release of the Fair
Work Ombudsman’s (FWO) Guidance
Note on the transitional provisions
in modern awards.
"Australian
business will start to feel the impact
of these increased costs of employment
from 1st July 2010 when the award
regulatory clean-up and phasing in
of modern of awards commences. While
a reduction in the number of awards
will benefit compliance in the long
run, the resulting increase in labour
costs is totally unacceptable and
a breach of promise by government
to affected industries.”
"ACCI has previously
succeeded before a Full Bench of Fair
Work Australia in having these costs
transition over a number of years,
but the higher costs and time-consuming
calculations identified by the FWO
are cold comfort to the hundreds of
thousands of small and medium business
(SMEs) employers who are battling
to understand why it will it cost
more to employ someone when their
employee’s duties will not be
performed differently."
"Added to these
concerns is the doubt cast by the
FWO’s Guidance Note on the right
of employers to apply a general practice
of absorbing these new costs into
over-award payments, a right ACCI
and our national network of thirty
five state and territory chambers
of commerce and national industry
associations won in hearings before
Fair Work Australia last year."
“The FWO’s
active compliance activities, this
Guidance Note, the new awards and
the minimum wage decision this Thursday
all ramp up the stress of doing business
just when SMEs are recovering from
the global financial crisis and new
economic uncertainty emerges courtesy
of doubt about the creditworthiness
of some European governments, as reflected
by the Reserve Bank of Australia’s
decision not to increase official
interest rates today.”
“Chambers of
Commerce and Industry Associations
are sources of trusted advice and
expertise to help employers navigate
these new obligations."
For further information:
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 03 9668 9950
/ 0457 836 763
|
| |
|
 |
Friday 28 May 2010
NSW’s largest business organisation
is calling for the abolition of NSW’s
small business minister after an analysis
revealed that there have been seven
small business ministers over the
last three years with an average term
of just six months.
NSW Business Chamber said small business
would be better served by the creation
of a full-time Small Business Commissioner
as part of a restructure of the government’s
business departments into a Department
of Business Growth, as outlined in
the NSW Business Chamber’s pre-election
policy blueprint, “10 Big Ideas
to Grow NSW”.
Ministers for Small Business
Term Time
Frank Terezini 21/05/2010 current
Peter Primrose 08/12/2009 21/05/2010
5 mths 14 days
Steve Whan 30/01/2009 04/12/2009 10
mths 5 days
Jodi McKay 11/11/2008 30/01/2009 2
mths 20 days
Ian McDonald (acting) 04/11/2008 11/11/2008
8 days
Tony Stewart 08/09/2008 04/11/2008
2 mths 4 days
Joe Tripodi 02/04/2007 05/09/2008
1yr 5mths 6 days
Average 6 months
“Small businesses in NSW are
not being adequately represented by
the parade of small business ministers
who have been appointed, dismissed
or promoted over the last three years,”
said Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW
Business Chamber. “The small
business minister has become a tokenistic
role to pay lip service to the concerns
of small businesses rather than being
a strong advocate for small business.
” Mr Cartwright said the call
to abolish the small business minister
was not a reflection of the people
who have filled the role but the attitude
that the NSW Government has towards
small business.
“The small business portfolio
shouldn’t be used as the proving
ground for new ministers on their
way up the ministerial ladder. It’s
an insult to the 300,000 employing
small business owners in NSW who are
100% committed to their businesses
– they expect the same commitment
from the Government.
“Small businesses employ more
than half of all private sector employment
in NSW, yet they aren’t being
properly represented within the Government.”
Mr Cartwright said the creation of
a Small Business Commissioner, modelled
on the highly successful Commissioner
in Victoria, would provide small business
with an advocate and a dispute resolution
mechanism in dealing with big business
and with the administration and market
practices of State Government agencies.
“The Small Business Commissioner
would be a set-term appointment that
would provide more stability and reliability
for small businesses than the current
average six-month turn over of small
business ministers.” Media Contact:
Paul Ritchie 0416 077 976 |
| |
|
 |
Thursday
27 May 2010
NSW’s largest
business organisation, NSW Business
Chamber, has expressed its disappointment
that Unions NSW would oppose cuts
in payroll tax that would encourage
employers to create more jobs, especially
given the $2.7 billion improvement
in the NSW Budget bottom line.
“Further cuts
to NSW’s high payroll tax are
affordable. The time is right to continue
the NSW Government’s campaign
of cutting payroll tax and getting
us into a more competitive position
with Queensland and Victoria,”
said Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW
Business Chamber.
“Payroll tax
is a tax on jobs. It’s a disincentive
for employers to grow their businesses
and put more people in jobs. I’ve
spoken to many employers who have
told me that if the rate was cut they
would be more likely to put on more
staff.
“I’m
surprised and disappointed by Unions
NSW objection to further cuts in the
NSW’s payroll tax rate that
would encourage employers to create
more jobs.
“It would appear
that Unions NSW is more interested
in exporting jobs to Victoria and
Queensland then creating a competitive
business environment in NSW.
“Cuts in NSW’s
high payroll tax rate is a campaign
that both employer and employee organisations
should get behind. It benefits employers
by making them more competitive with
other businesses and it benefits employees
by encouraging more employment opportunities.”
Mr Cartwright said
that Unions NSW objection to further
cuts in payroll tax would undercut
NSW’s competitiveness considering
that other states like Victoria have
just announced further cuts to their
payroll tax rate.
“Victoria will
be cutting their payroll tax rate
further to 4.9% from 1 July. NSW’s
rate is currently 5.65%, with a further
cut to 5.5% from 1 January 2011. Unions
NSW is asking NSW to give up on the
race to be competitive with other
states.”
NSW Business Chamber
outlined a fully-funded program to
cut NSW’s payroll tax rate to
5% over the next four years in its
pre-election policy blueprint, “10
Big Ideas to Grow NSW”.
“Our proposal
to cut payroll tax in 2011-12 to 5.35%
would cost $185 million dollars. This
is affordable given that the current
projection for the budget surplus
is around $1.7 billion.”
Mr Cartwright said
that if Unions NSW was seriously concerned
about the increasing cost of the public
sector they should be advocating for
public sector reform to rein in costs
not slugging businesses with uncompetitive
taxes.
Media Contact: Paul
Ritchie 0416 077 976
|
| |
|
|
Friday
21 May 2010
Statement by Mr Nathan Backhouse,
Manager Trade Policy and International
Affairs
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry’s (ACCI’s)
Trade Policy and International Affairs
Committee, representing more than
20,000 Australian export trading companies
in State Chambers of Commerce and
Australia’s major national Business
Councils, held its second meeting
for 2010 in Adelaide.
The Trade Committee
welcomed work by the Australian Government,
supported by local industry, to maintain
pressure on nations to resist protectionism
as the global financial crisis still
plays out in Europe and other economies.
Industry backed the
federal budget’s funding for
the TradeStart programme and Austrade
activities abroad, but is disappointed
that funding for the Export Development
Market Grants (EMDG) Scheme has not
increased.
Local trade managers
in business organisations also saw
opportunities for closer work with
Austrade to deliver trade services
on the domestic front.
The role of government
in supporting business networks was
discussed and opportunities canvassed.
Currently the South Australian Government
supports a network of bilateral Business
Councils through the Council of International
Trade and Commerce SA (CITCSA). This
network has proven invaluable in making
international linkages, providing
business opportunities and facilitating
trade to the SA business community,
particularly SME’s. The Committee
will take this initiative to the Australian
Government recommending development
of a similar model at the national
level.
Nick Begakis, AM,
Chair of the Trade Committee said
“the lack of certainty in EMDG
returns is a source of frustration
to exporters using the Scheme. With
one in five Australian jobs related
to exports, attention needs to be
focused on practical measures available
to support exporters. This scheme
has been a standout success in encouraging
hesitant exporters to take the significant
financial risks involved and go global.”
“Problems in
accessing trade finance continue to
exist, and ACCI’s evidence last
week to the Senate Economics Committee
puts pressure on the banks to come
to the table and better support our
industry doing business overseas.
For further information:
Nathan Backhouse Manager Trade Policy
and International Affairs 02 6270
8044/0431 615 709
|
| |
|
|
Friday
21 May 2010
Statement by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief
Executive
Australia's largest
employer body, the Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry, is continuing
to resist the Australian Government's
push to force a $20 billion per year
increase in employer superannuation
payments from 9% to 12% of payroll.
ACCI is also developing
a strategy to force the Government
to come good with its budget promise
that "employers will take increases
in superannuation guarantee contributions
into account when negotiating future
wage agreements."
ACCI has also rejected
claims by the financial services industry
that these increases will not burden
business.
In the past fortnight
ACCI has met with the Federal Minister
for Superannuation Hon. Chris Bowen
MP, and with the Association of Superannuation
Funds of Australia to express concern
on behalf of its 350,000 strong employer
membership.
"The debate
over the proposed Resources Tax continues
to be used to muddy the water over
who is paying the higher superannuation
levy. It is not; repeat not, going
to be paid by the Government from
this proposed tax. The Government
is going to legislate to require the
higher superannuation to be paid by
the same employers who currently pay
the 9%."
"Even though
the Government is phasing in this
cost, it still represents a one third
(33%) levy increase, or $20 billion
per year once fully implemented.
"Budget allocations
identifying the superannuation levy
as a cost to the Commonwealth arise
not because the government is paying
the levy, but because Government tax
concessions on superannuation cost
the budget as the superannuation pie
gets larger. Employers will still
be required to pay."
"The capacity
of employers across the economy to
recoup a portion, let alone the whole
of the $20 billion extra superannuation
payments from future wage increases
in a decentralised wage system is
very difficult and in many cases not
possible. To say this increase will
be deferred wages is wishful thinking,
unless systems are put in place to
compel wage trade-offs."
ACCI has also repudiated
claims by the financial services industry
that employers can afford these increases
because of the company tax reductions.
"Those company
tax reductions are conditional on
a new tax, the Resource Tax, being
imposed on business. And two thirds
of small business, 420,000 of which
are employers, don't get a company
tax reduction even if comes to pass.
And it does not take too many years
after paying higher superannuation
for the superannuation increase to
outweigh the tax relief for those
who get it."
"Employers and
small business don't take kindly to
the superannuation industry, with
its vested interest in creaming off
fees and commissions, advocating the
spending of someone else's money and
agitating the government to break
its 2007 election promise not to raise
the levy. The financial services and
superannuation industries need to
focus on how lowering their fees and
commissions can provide better retirement
incomes. Total fees on superannuation
balances in 2008 were reportedly $14.1
billion. Reducing these fees by half
would provide retirement benefits
to employees at least equal to the
rise in the superannuation levy, without
putting that cost on the nation's
employers and the productive side
of the economy."
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief Executive 0417
264 862
Ben Carter Marketing
& Membership Manager 0457 836
763
|
| |
|
|
Wednesday
19 May 2010
The
May ACCI Small Business Survey shows
a marginal improvement in Small Business
Conditions over the March quarter,
with this index rising to 52.9 –
the highest level since the December
quarter of 2007 and around 2.5 points
above its five year average of 50.4.
Small businesses expect their business
conditions to improve further over
the June quarter.
The Survey
also found that:
*Small business expects
Australia’s economic growth
to rebound strongly over the next
twelve months, with the Expected Economic
Performance index increasing from
60.0 to 64.0 over the March quarter;
*While
the actual indexes for the March quarter
remain contractionary, small business
expects Selling Prices, Profit Growth
and Employment to improve over the
next three months;
*The
decline in Overtime Utilisation is
expected to moderate further over
the June quarter; and
*Smalll
business expects business investment
to continue to be weak over the next
three months, with Investment in Plant
and Equipment declining marginally
to 50.0.
Following four official
interest rate hikes in the six months
to March 2010, coupled with some major
lenders increasing their lending rates
by more than the official rate rise,
Level of Interest Rates has risen
from the 12th to the 3rd largest impediment
to small business investment. Skill
shortages have also resurfaced as
an impediment to small business investment,
with Availability of Suitably Qualified
Employees rising from the 13th to
the 4th position, the first time it
has moved into top five position since
the September quarter of 2008.
Mr Greg Evans, Director
of Economics & Industry Policy,
Australian Chamber of Commerce and
Industry, commented:
“While small
business experienced some welcome
improvements in business confidence
and trading conditions over the March
quarter, small business performance
in general is still lagging behind
its larger counterpart. Selling prices
remain contractionary, which continues
to put downward pressure on small
business profitability and increases
the need for working capital.”
“Moreover,
the outlook of increasing interest
rates and difficulties in accessing
finance has further constrained small
business investment. The two-speed
economy has also put further pressure
on small business to attract staff
with appropriate skill levels. Therefore
it is important for government to
understand and address challenges
currently confronting the small business
community to ensure balanced and sustainable
economic growth. This includes an
ongoing commitment to tax reform especially
in areas affecting smaller enterprises
such as income tax, payroll tax, depreciation
allowances & capital gains tax.”
The survey assessed
business conditions and business confidence
amongst 1,526 small businesses around
the country over the January, February
and March period. A full copy of the
Survey is available on the ACCI website
at http://www.acci.asn.au/SurveySBS.htm
For further information:
Greg Evans Director
of Economics & Industry Policy
02 6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Tuesday
18 May 2010
NSW's largest business organisation,
NSW Business Chamber, said that an
NRMA survey that shows businesses
are paying up to $10,000 in extra
wages and fuel costs as a result of
traffic congestion reinforced the
need for a Transport Tsar to implement
a traffic demand strategy for Sydney's
transport network.
NSW Business
Chamber outlined the need for a Transport
Tsar as part of its 10 Big Ideas to
Grow NSW campaign (www.10bigideas.com.au).
The 10 Big Ideas also highlighted
the importance of encouraging regional
location for major government agencies.
“This
survey tells us what business already
knows – it is becoming more
expensive to do business in the metropolitan
area because of the costs of congestion.
“Transport
is the number one issue for businesses
in Sydney. Businesses are paying for
congestion through lost productivity,
increased fuel costs, and lost business
opportunities.
“We
need a Transport Tsar to take control
of Sydney's 15 transport agencies
and get them working together to deliver
better transport outcomes for Sydney's
business owners and commuters,”
said Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW
Business Chamber.
“We
want a Transport Tsar that is charged
with putting in place a demand strategy
for our transport network –
a strategy that will use what we already
have in transport infrastructure more
effectively.
Mr Cartwright
said that a Transport Tsar could introduce
a range of measures to spread the
peak including:
Trialling 10am starting
school hours for high school students;
Variable tolling
– implementing of peak, shoulder
and off-peak pricing;
Peak, shoulder and
off-peak pricing of public transport
Public sector employees encouraged
to start work during non-peak periods
Private sector incentives
to shift hours away from traditional
working hours; Incentives
to encourage car pooling
Greater
use of GPS, web and app technology
to assist in trip planning; and Encourage
greater housing density close to employment
areas.
“A "business
as usual" approach to transport
will only increase the costs on congestion
on business and the community in general.
It?s time to start thinking outside
the gridlock and put in place a demand
strategy for our transport network.”
Media Contact: Paul Ritchie 0416 077
976 |
| |
|
|
Monday
17 May 2010
PETER
ANDERSON:
The Annual Wage Review being conducted
by Fair Work Australia is part of
the new industrial relations system
established by the Government.
The Government says that its system
will get the balance right, and that
its system will deliver fairness.
Fairness in the workplace is not just
an issue for employees, it’s
an issue for employers as well.
Australia’s employers, particularly
the half a million small to medium
business employers who are affected
by this case, will be looking to Fair
Work Australia to deliver a fair outcome
for those businesses.
This case is not a straightforward
case, nor a ‘catch up’
wage case as made out by the ACTU.
This case involves the employers of
Australia who, by and large, are in
the slow lane of a two-speed economic
recovery.
Those half a million small or medium
businesses have faced six interest
rate increases in the past nine months.
They are employers who have kept people
in work during the downturn, even
where that may not have been the economically
rational thing to do in the short
term. Those employers have acted fairly
and those employers expect a fair
deal from this case
.
This case also involves the implementation
of wage increases at the very time
that not only is the economy in an
uneven recovery, but there are increases
in labour costs for those employers
coming through the pipeline, as a
result of the new
industrial relations system the Government
has put in place.
Even without this wage increase, from
the first of July these employers
are facing increases in penalty rates,
increases in allowances, increases
in overtime rates and the like. Where
that occurs, this case will be a double-whammy.
That is why
this case needs to substantially moderate
the ACTU claim.
This is not a case where there needs
to be any risks taken with our economic
recovery.
This is not a case where there needs
to be any risks taken with jobs in
Australia. We need to ensure that
any increase awarded is moderate.
Employers are not saying that there
should not be an increase. Employers
are taking the fair position
and saying there should be a modest
increase, but one that reflects the
reality of businesses in the slow
lane of the twospeed recovery, and
the reality of increases coming through
the wage system irrespective of this
particular case.
JOURNALIST:
Can you put a figure on modest?
PETER ANDERSON:
Employers are saying that increases
should be between ten dollars and
fifty cents and twelve dollars and
fifty cents per week. With that level
of increase together with the other
levels of increase that are coming
through the award system and
together with the fact that there
are some income tax reductions from
the 1st of July, low wage earners
will be protected as well as the jobs
of low-paid wage earners.
That is the important objective of
this case. Fairness requires attention
to both sides of the industrial equation.
It requires fairness to the businesses
that are paying the wages, fairness
to the wages of those employees, as
well as protection of their jobs.
JOURNALIST:
If the unions get what they want,
how many small businesses could go
under?
PETER ANDERSON:
If the union gets what it wants there
will be untold pressure on the bottom
line wage costs of these businesses.
It will be paid for in a combination
of businesses struggling to make ends
meet, some of which will not be able
to. It will be paid
for in some reductions of working
hours, and it will be paid for in
some losses of jobs. Throughout the
small business economy in particular,
throughout the service industries,
the local shops, the local cafes,
the local traders, we will see the
impact through less business activity,
less capacity for those businesses
to meet their bottom line, and less
employment.
JOURNALIST:
How long is this case likely to go
for?
PETER ANDERSON:
The case lasts for a week. There have
been submissions presented to the
tribunal since March. Last week’s
post-budget submissions have been
put before the tribunal. We have a
week now where all the parties are
going to put their case
forward. What is important in that
respect is that the Government puts
forward a position which is neutral,
which is more neutral than what the
Government has so far proposed. The
Government has a responsibility to
take account of the
interests of the small to medium businesses
who have to pay these wage increases,
not just the position of the unions.
JOURNALIST:
And you’re expecting a verdict
in June?
PETER ANDERSON:
Under the Government’s industrial
relations changes these increases,
if there is any awarded, come into
operation from the 1st of July so
that means the decision is likely
to be in June. What that also means,
and I think this is an important
point for the media to pick up on,
is that despite the ACTU saying that
workers have not had a wage increase
since August or October 2008, the
reality is that there has only been
a gap or a pause decided last year
of nine months. The increase that
was paused last year would have occurred
from October last year, and there
will now be an increase in July of
this year and that is a nine month
period. There has been a wages pause
for nine months in Australia, not
the two years that the ACTU is pretending.
|
| |
|
 |
Friday
14 May 2010
Statement
by David Gregory, Director Workplace
Policy
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry, Australia's
largest and most representative business
organisation, has given evidence today
to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation
Committee hearing into the Government's
National Paid Parental Leave Scheme.
“The award
wage case being arbitrated this week
by Fair Work Australia has the challenge
of setting minimum and award wages
in the midst of an uneven two-speed
economic recovery.”
“The case primarily
involves small and medium employers
who are in the slow lane of the two-speed
economy. These employers, typically
small shops, cafes and local traders,
have been hit with six interest rate
rises in eight months and not yet
seen the economic recovery boost their
capacity to pay above-inflation wages,
as the unions and Government would
want. A more moderate rise in the
region of $10.50 to $12.50 per hour
is justified.”
“Many of these
smaller employers also face the double
whammy of wage rises plus increases
in penalty rates, overtime and allowances
from 1 July when new industrial awards
kick-in. If arbitrated wage costs
are not moderated then wage rises
in this sector will come at the cost
of jobs.”
The Annual Wage Review
being conducted by Fair Work Australia
extends beyond employees on the minimum
wage to include all award wages including
some professionals paid above $100,000
per year. It involves no productivity
or efficiency trade-offs for the rises
ordered.
ACCI will present
its case to the tribunal on Tuesday.
ACCI submissions, including our Post-Budget
Submission, are available at www.acci.asn.au/submissions,
and the Fair Work Australia web site.
For further information:
David Gregory Director
of Workplace Policy 03 9668 9950 /
0417 052 390
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Friday
14 May 2010
Statement
by David Gregory, Director Workplace
Policy
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry, Australia's
largest and most representative business
organisation, has given evidence today
to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation
Committee hearing into the Government's
National Paid Parental Leave Scheme.
In its evidence,
ACCI has ‘welcomed the introduction
of the Government's Scheme’
supports ‘other policy measures
that are part of the overall work
and family equation, such as adequate
community child care facilities’,
considers the Government-funded scheme
‘measured and consistent with
what is affordable and necessary for
an economy-wide Scheme of this nature’,
and proposes ‘administration
of the Government payment scheme through
the Government agency rather than
employer payrolls.’
“There is an
increasing convergence of views that
red tape pressure on small business
in particular needs to be reduced.
Indications given by the ACTU in evidence
this morning that unions would support
sensible measures to take pressure
off small business are a step in the
right direction.”
A copy of ACCI’s
Opening Statement to the Senate hearings,
delivered today by ACCI's Manager
of Workplace Relations and Legal Affairs
Daniel Mammone, is available on the
ACCI website at www.acci.asn.au/SpeechesMain.htm.
For further information:
David Gregory Director
of Workplace Policy 03 9668 9950 /
0417 052 390
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
12
May 2010
NSW’s largest business organisation,
NSW Business Chamber, has welcomed
the introduction of legislation into
the NSW Parliament that will allow
for independent costing of election
promises
“This legislation is welcome
by business as a way of ensuring that
the commitments made by both parties
are costed and funded”, said
Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW Business
Chamber.
“This is an important step
forward for NSW and I congratulate
Premier Keneally for agreeing to the
request for the legislation by the
Leader of the Opposition, Mr O’Farrell.
“It simply makes the election
policy process more robust and ensures
we see less policy on the run.
“The last thing NSW needs
in coming months is a spend-a-thon
which puts at risk the AAA rating.
“The Auditor-General is independent
of government and respected by all.
This process will ensure we don’t
see a repeat of previous elections
where there were claims and counter-claims
about promises.
Mr Cartwright said he hoped the
Audit process would include the Auditor
General making comment on the robustness
of costing assumptions.
“We can’t have a situation
where a costing is made which is unsupported.
In other words, if for example, a
party makes a $250,000 commitment
to build a police station, we need
to know the $250,000 figure is realistic
and not plucked out of the air.
Mr Cartwright said the legislation
would improve the transparency of
election commitments and ensure that
the parties only made commitments
that were affordable.
“Clearly if a political party
is making excessive promises then
this process allows the fiscal credibility
of that party to become a proper election
issue.”
For more information contact Paul
Ritchie on 0416 077 976 |
| |
|
 |
11 May 2010
“This Budget sees a sooner-than-expected
return to surplus and the government
meeting its own fiscal rules, but
it introduces a huge question mark
over future growth,” BCA Chief
Executive Katie Lahey said.
The 2010–11
federal Budget forecasts a return
to budget surplus by 2012–13
underpinned by the government meeting
its commitments to cap real expenditure
growth at 2 per cent and to constrain
the level of tax to GDP. It also outlines
a range of measures that have the
potential to enhance productive capacity.
The proposed introduction
of the Resource Super Profits Tax
(RSPT), however, creates a new and
substantial risk – both for
the economic outlook and for the stability
of the Budget itself.
Read the full statement
at:
http://www.bca.com.au/Content/101683.aspx
|
| |
|
 |
Wednesday
12 May 2010
PETER ANDERSON:
Tonight’s budget serves up a
sweet and sour dish to the business
community.
Sweet because the Government is trying
to get the deficit down and there
is some small business tax relief
and good new investment in skills.
Sour because some of the deficit
reduction depends on higher taxes.
The proposed Resource Tax is a $9
billion a year hit on an industry
that saved our bacon during the global
financial crisis. The Superannuation
levy increase is a $20 billion hit
on one million employers over the
next decade. And there is no plan
to get rid of payroll tax even though
the Henry Tax Review recommended it.
Over time these outweigh the much
needed small business tax relief.
With respect to other measures,
the Budget tonight proposes that the
deficit largely be reduced through
a combination of projected economic
growth, the additional tax from the
resources industry as well as deferral
of a number of measures such as the
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme.
In that context the Budget is workmanlike.
Its capacity to reduce the deficit
earlier than anticipated is a product
of the growth forecasts by-and-large.
If they come off that will take some
pressure off interest rates.
But in an overall sense for the business
community, the Budget includes new
taxes, new taxes which are in the
long-term going to be a drain on the
Australian economy.
JOURNALIST:
Without going ahead with the mining
tax would we be looking forward to
a Budget surplus three years earlier?
PETER ANDERSON:
The mining tax kicks in in the third
year of the projected Budget forecasts.
The major contributions to the reduction
of the surplus are actually forecasts
of growth being higher, as well as
the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme
deferral. In
that context the mining tax is going
to be a drain on future economic activity.
What the Government has to recognise
here is that putting a large tax on
the mining industry ultimately taxes
the whole economy. In addition to
that, the Government is making the
assumption that the resource industry,
which it is in a battle with at the
moment, is still going to be the industry
that effectively drives the growth
of what is still a two-speed economy.
JOURNALIST:
Do you think it is still
a possibility that the Government
might back down in the next year or
so on the new mining tax?
PETER ANDERSON:
There is no doubt that the Government
is going to have to look closely at
the design of its proposed tax. Whatever
the merits of the argument about the
existing royalty system, the Government
is taking an additional $9 billion
per year out
of the industry that has saved Australia’s
bacon. That is a very risky approach
given that the Government is putting
a large measure of its trust in that
industry to maintain growth to sustain
us into Budget surplus.
JOURNALIST:
The benefits of the Budget to small
business don’t kick in for over
two years. Do you have a view on that?
PETER ANDERSON:
It’s disappointing that the
Government has not decoupled the small
business tax benefits from the resources
tax. This means that the capacity
of the Budget to deliver those benefits
to the small business community is
going to be tied up in
the political football that will become
the debate over the resources tax.
The Government needs to put in place
sensible tax relief measures for the
small business community.
JOURNALIST:
Can I just ask another question? The
fact that the small business benefits
don’t kick in for another two
years, is that a concern?
PETER ANDERSON:
The delivery of relief to small businesses
on tax, which is merited in its own
right, is now going to become part
of the political football that is
the debate about the Resources Tax.
Relief to small business is necessary,
it’s justified, it should
be delivered, and it should not depend
on the introduction of a new tax in
Australia.
JOURNALIST:
So should it be delivered sooner rather
than later?
PETER ANDERSON:
The Government is bringing forward
the small business relief earlier
than the general reduction in corporate
tax. I think that they are reasonable
measures given that we come to this
budget with very substantial deficits
and, still on the budget
papers today, a $40 billion deficit
now, which the Government says can
be pared back by $27 billion in the
next twelve months. That assumes a
very substantial rate of economic
activity and economic growth. We have
a two-speed economy.
There is a lot of pressure on that
second part of the two-speed economy,
which is not forging ahead.
JOURNALIST:
The Government has announced measures
in the budget to help big business
raise extra funds in the expansion
of the corporate bond market, but
there doesn’t seem to be anything
there for small business.
PETER ANDERSON:
The benefits for small business are
in respect of those tax changes.
JOURNALIST:
But in terms of raising funds?
PETER ANDERSON:
One of the problems with the budget
is that there is very little in terms
of encouraging small businesses to
try and deal
with the problems of capital access
that small businesses had during the
course of the Global Financial Crisis.
The
Government is relying on financial
markets to restore themselves to health.
The Government is relying on its growth
assumptions, on global conditions
recovering, and there not being any
shocks or setbacks in either the domestic
or the
global economy. Some of those assumptions,
given the last eighteen months, are
really on the optimistic side even
though
they may very well be realised and
we hope they are realised. |
| |
|
 |
Tuesday
11 May 2010
NSW’s largest business organisation,
NSW Business Chamber said the changed
economic projections contained within
the 2010-11 Federal Budget represented
good news about Australia’s
immediate economic prospects
. “As the rest of the world
struggles, we are experiencing the
dividends of strong economic management
by successive Australian Governments
of both political persuasions”,
said Stephen Cartwright, CEO of NSW
Business Chamber.
“We have weathered the storm
– in part because of the economic
reforms undertaken by previous Governments
and in part, because the counter-cyclical
stimulus measures contained in the
stimulus package and the continued
success of the resources sector.
“Whilst the Government estimates
a $40 billion budget deficit in 2010-11,
the Budget projections predict a return
to surplus in 2012-13. However, the
return to surplus has a caveat in
that it is funded by the new Resource
Super Profits Tax (RSPT) which will
provide a total of $15 billion in
additional taxation by 2013-14. The
surplus projection is also based on
the assumption of continued strong
terms of trade.
“The Government has argued
that the RSPT is the antidote to the
two-speed economy. We are yet to be
convinced that the best way to handle
a two speed economy is to slow down
the fast lane.
“It is important to note that
with or without the RSPT, Australia’s
fiscal position is stronger than any
of the world’s most advanced
economies.
Mr Cartwright said the 2010-11 Budget
contained a number of initiatives
that were welcomed by business. “We
welcome the decision to reduce the
company tax rate to 28% for small
businesses in 2013-14. Other companies
will see the company tax rate fall
to 29% in 2013-14 and 28% in 2014-15.The
decision to extend write-offs and
rebates for smaller businesses will
remove unnecessary red-tape from small
businesses.
“We believe these initiatives
should stand alone from the RSPT.
Mr Cartwright said the new initiatives
to encourage Sydney to be a regional
financial services sector recognised
the resilience of the Australian financial
sector and the prudence of government
regulation in the sector.
“We have a great story to
tell in financial services. This is
a well regulated sector, with a strong
skills base and these initiatives
will provide impetus to this highly
successful sector
. “I am particularly pleased
that the government has expanded funding
for vocational education and training.
This includes further $79 million
in funding for the Kickstart program
and additional training and support
for 22,500 apprentices. This support
will ensure that Australian businesses
have access to a sufficient skills
base as the economy accelerates
. Mr Cartwright said there was a
responsibility on the Government to
meet the ambitious fiscal targets
set in tonight’s budget.
“Tonight’s Budget is
the dividend of reform and the challenge
before this Government, as the Australian
economy again accelerates, is to continue
with a reform agenda that improves
productivity, creates jobs and lays
the foundation for further growth.”
For more information contact Paul
Ritchie on 0416 077 976 |
| |
|
 |
Tuesday
11 May 2010
Statement
by Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The Federal Budget
projects an optimistic yet realistic
view of the growth prospects of the
Australian economy and wisely commences
the process of bringing the Commonwealth
budget into repair after 18 months
of substantial stimulus spending.
The earlier than
expected return to a surplus position
in 2012-13 is welcomed by business.
ACCI has put the case that this is
essential to ensure higher debt and
deficits do not place pressure on
interest rates.
Australia’s
stronger growth outlook is set to
bolster revenues over the forward
estimates. However, ACCI considers
greater scope still exists to reduce
spending across government. This will
provide the opportunity for earlier
and more extensive tax reform.
ACCI has welcomed
the depreciation changes for small
business and the cut in the company
tax rate. We are concerned though
that failure to decouple these important
initiatives from the Resource Super
Profits Tax (RSPT) may make these
benefits a political football.
Assisting the return
to surplus is the implementation of
the RSPT which we remain concerned
will affect investment in this sector
and businesses that are directly and
indirectly linked to the resources
industry.
While there are no
specific further tax initiatives for
business in the budget, we hold the
view that tax reform is an unfinished
business especially in relation to
the Henry Tax Review’s proposal
to abolish payroll tax, provide further
capital gains tax relief and the need
for continued reduction in income
tax.
ACCI welcomes the
infrastructure initiatives including
the $5.6 billion over the next decade
for the State Infrastructure Fund
and an extra $1 billion for the Australian
Rail Track Corporation.
Skills investment
has also received due recognition
with $661 million directed at the
Skills for Sustainable Growth strategy.
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
Greg Evans Director,
Economics & Industry Policy 02
6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Monday
10 May 2010
Statement
by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry (ACCI), Australia's
largest and most representative business
organisation, says that recent instability
in overseas financial markets arising
from sovereign debt issues in Europe
should be used as a basis for attracting
foreign capital to Australia and support
the provision of finance to local
businesses, in evidence at this morning's
Senate Economics Reference Committee
hearing in Canberra, which is conducting
an Inquiry into Access of Small Business
to Finance.
ACCI has also made
a call for a Productivity Commission
inquiry into competition in the retail
banking industry in the wake of the
global financial crisis.
“Small and
medium businesses have been disadvantaged
over the past 18 months by a combination
of constrained capital flows, higher
cost of overseas funds and less competition
in the local retail banking sector.”
“Australia
is a stable destination for capital.
The jumpy nature of overseas markets
should not be used by our local banks
to raise the cost of finance. Bank
margins were already fattened at the
expense of small business during 2009,
with rate rises passed on in full
but not the full value of rate reductions.”
ACCI's submission
to the Senate Economics Committee
raises important questions about whether
smaller businesses have been getting
a fair deal on accessing finance and
its price.
“The inquiry
should shine a spotlight on banking
practices and seek full accountability
from the banking sector for the manner
in which it decides to offer small
business finance, the security it
demands, and the interest rates imposed
on finance and renegotiated finance.
Since the global financial crisis,
banks have increased their risk margins
for small business loans and tightened
their lending criteria through lower
loan-to-valuation ratios, stricter
collateral requirements and higher
interest coverage ratios.”
“As important
to our economy as a healthy banking
system is, and as well managed as
our retail banks are, the banking
industry cannot hide behind its stability
and profitability to sidestep the
legitimate concerns of small and medium
businesses when it comes to a fair
deal in accessing affordable finance.”
The ACCI submission
follows its General Council meeting
in Melbourne on 26 March, where the
Presidents and Chief Executives of
Australia’s leading Chambers
of Commerce and Industry Associations
concluded that access to finance was
"now the most substantial issue
facing the day-to-day wellbeing of
Australia’s small and medium
business sectors."
ACCI was the first
national business organisation to
last year call for a national and
public inquiry into the difficulties
small businesses have in accessing
finance. As well as the increase in
the cost of finance, an immediate
concern for small businesses is the
availability of domestic and export
finance from major lenders.
In its evidence today
ACCI made seven recommendations that
would assist small business, including
a program of increasing the understanding
of the small business sector by lending
managers in retail banks.
ACCI was represented
in the hearing by Chief Executive
Peter Anderson, Director of Economics
and Industry Policy Greg Evans, and
Economic Adviser Dr. Si Wei Goo.
The submission is
available on the ACCI website at http://www.acci.asn.au/SubmissionsMain.htm
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
Greg Evans Director,
Economics & Industry Policy 02
6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Friday
7 May 2010
Statement
by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry (ACCI), Australia's
largest and most representative business
organisation, supports the proposed
small business tax concessions outlined
in the Government Response to the
Henry Tax Review, and has called for
them to be included in the forward
estimates of next week's Federal Budget,
in order to prevent them being a political
football caught up in the debate over
the Resource Super Profits Tax.
In the current edition
of the ACCI Review, released today,
ACCI identifies the benefits to small
business from the proposed changes
to depreciation, asset-write offs
and company tax reductions.
“Although the
Government response did not go as
far as ACCI was seeking and the Henry
Review recommended, each of these
measures will be beneficial to small
business even though they are not
evenly spread given business structures
and tax circumstances vary across
the sector.”
“While most
of the employing small businesses
of Australia will join with ACCI in
opposing the compulsory increase in
their 9% superannuation levy, which
was a breach of promise by the Government
and not recommended by the Henry Review,
these same businesses will want the
Government and parliament to deliver
on its promise to provide tax relief
in these other areas.”
ACCI does not support
the Resource Super Profits Tax. Taxes
like these flow through the economy
and cost all taxpayers, including
smaller businesses. The ACCI Review
concludes that “the immediate
challenge for the Government as well
as the Opposition in its budget reply,
is to provide a funding basis for
these pro-small business measures
outside of the plan to introduce a
new tax on the resources sector.”
The ACCI Review also
identifies the lack of relief on capital
gains tax for small business as creating
a large gap in terms of Government
tax support for the retirement nest
egg of small business compared to
the retirement savings of employees.
“Small business
owners have their retirement savings
invested in the capital of their business.
Without capital gains tax relief they
are not being supported in their retirement
savings anywhere like the concessions
provided to wage and salary earners.”
The May 2010 edition
of the ACCI Review, which also overviews
budget measures to support workplace
productivity, skills and growth in
trade, can be found at www.acci.asn.au.
For further information:
Greg Evans Director,
Economics & Industry Policy 02
6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Thursday 6 May
2010
TOPICS:
RETAIL AWARDS, YOUTH EMPLOYMENT, RESOURCE
SUPER PROFITS TAX
PETER ANDERSON:
No young person should be denied useful
work that pays award rates because
of the new Industrial Relations laws.
That proposition is going to be tested
today in Fair Work Australia. It is
going to be tested in the Retail Industry
Awards because since 1st January we
have seen retailers have to deny employment
to young people, indeed dismiss some
young people from their jobs, because
of the inflexibility in the minimum
engagement rule in the Retail Awards.
The reduction in the number of Industrial
Awards will ultimately be to our benefit.
But in that process we have created
some problems and additional costs
for industry. Today is an opportunity
for Fair Work Australia to fix one
of the
fundamental problems that exists with
the new award system, and it is a
problem that has cost young people
their jobs.
Australia’s Industrial Relations
system can only be strong and stable
if we have a body of laws which respects
the right of business and young people
to be employed on award rates, and
do so in a way that is consistent
with the operation of those businesses.
Consistent with the case before Fair
Work Australia today, we are releasing
an Issues Paper on Youth Employment.
Young people, particularly in the
wake of a Global Financial Crisis
are in a very vulnerable position
in Australia’s labour market.
A quarter of a million young people
are unemployed, another 300,000 young
people are underemployed, that
means 550,000 or 26% of the youth
labour market are either out of work,
or seeking more work. Our Industrial
Relations system needs to play its
part. It needs to make sure that young
people are not denied work because
of inflexible award rules.
The case today is also a significant
test for the Government’s claim
that the Fair Work System has ‘got
the balance right’ between fairness
and flexibility. For that balance
to be right, we need to rid our Industrial
Relations system of cases where young
people are denied jobs because of
inflexible award rules.
There is a clear way ahead in this
case. The Award rules can be changed
to ensure that young people are not
denied work, whilst at the same time
maintaining the integrity of the safety
net.
JOURNALIST:
So can you outline what the case is
today?
PETER ANDERSON:
The case involves an application by
retail employers to vary the Retail
Award, which commenced from the 1st
January, to add flexibility to the
minimum engagement rule which currently
says that a young person cannot be
employed for less than three hours
minimum.
We have seen cases where after-school
work by young people has been denied
because three hours does not fit within
the
requirements of those employees or
the trading requirements of the shops
that employ them. In those circumstances
a three hour minimum is inflexible,
doesn’t meet the needs of the
business or the young people, has
cost them their jobs,
and that needs to be changed and there
is a way in which the tribunal can
do that.
JOURNALIST:
How should that be changed? Obviously
you wouldn’t want a situation
where employers are just putting people
on for a couple of hours when it’s
their main job
.
PETER ANDERSON:
The Government said that its system
would be both fair and flexible. A
fair system means that there should
be basic rules which regulate minimum
engagement. A flexible system is one
that says that those rules can be
modified where it is necessary to
do so to protect jobs. There is some
obvious ways forward particularly
if the tribunal focuses on the circumstances
of shops that do not trade for long
hours, that only trade for one or
two hours after school closes, so
that
those shops are not denied from employing
young people, particularly in country
Australia, where trading hours are
far more restrictive than in metropolitan
cities.
JOURNALIST:
When did the system become, as you
say, so inflexible on this matter?
PETER ANDERSON:
The retail industry has been regulated
over a number of years through different
rules in different States. In Victoria
the minimum engagement rule was two
hours before these new awards came
in. In South Australia there was for
many years
a one and a half hour rule for minimum
engagement for after-school employees.
In other parts of Australia there
has been a three hour minimum engagement
rule. The tribunal, in trying to bring
about a National Award, has created
a onesize-
fits-all rule. That rule is inflexible,
and is going to need to change if
the system is going to meet the objectives
that the Government has set for it.
JOURNALIST:
So are you confident that there won’t
be any incidences of exploitation
under the change you propose?
PETER ANDERSON:
It is important that there isn’t
exploitation. No business is going
to set about employing people on a
basis that doesn’t work for
young people or for the business,
simply because we know that young
people are very independently minded.
Some young people walk away from their
jobs if they find those job rosters
unappealing to them. A business which
is subject to a sensible minimum requirement,
but where that minimum requirement
has enough flexibility, when a young
person sees it in their interest to
work for less than a minimum
engagement, is going to be a business
that is meeting the needs of young
people and an Industrial Relations
system that has credibility. If the
system does not create that degree
of flexibility, the system will discredit
itself, and ultimately if the system
discredits itself, then the calls
for change to the system will emerge
and they will become louder, and eventually,
that will destabilise the system the
Government has put in place.
JOURNALIST:
Just on the Issues Paper, what is
the most concerning aspect to it?
PETER ANDERSON:
The most concerning aspect is that
the relative position of young people
in the labour market has deteriorated
throughout the Global Financial Crisis
compared to other categories of employees
in the labour market. When an economic
downturn occurs, young people become
more vulnerable in the labour market.
That was the case with past recessions,
and that has been the case with this
downturn. What will occur here is
that the capacity of young people
to get a foothold in the labour market
will be behind the 8-ball if the industrial
relations system does not provide
the degree of sensible flexibility
that is necessary for young people
to take that step to get into the
labour market, to create some earnings
for themselves and then move forward
in both their education and their
careers.
[inaudible]…what about the Resource
Super Profits Tax?
PETER ANDERSON:
The business community is very concerned
at continuing reports that the proposed
Resource Super Profits Tax is the
funding basis for additional superannuation
for Australian employees through a
rise in the superannuation guarantee
from 9% to 12%.
Over the course of this week the business
community has endeavoured to inform
the Australian public that the Government
is proposing that this increase occur
as the result of a higher levy on
employers. It is going to be paid
for by employers, not by the Resource
Super Profits Tax. The cost to employers
is in the realm of $20 billion per
year once this measure is fully implemented.
That is not a cost that is being transferred
or funded by the proposed Resource
Super Profits Tax. That tax is going
to fund other elements of the Government’s
response to the Henry Tax Review but
not the increase in the Superannuation
Guarantee Levy.
In that context the business community
is very concerned about comments this
morning by the former Governor of
the Reserve Bank, Bernie Fraser. Mr
Fraser needs to be informed that it
is employers in Australia, not the
resources industry,
that is going to fund the higher increases
in superannuation from 9% to 12 %.
It is also deeply concerning that
Mr Fraser and others are not recognising
the significant issue of sovereign
risk associated with the proposed
Resource Super Profits Tax. Sovereign
risk is a fundamental issue when it
comes to governments
putting in place new taxation arrangements
where there are long term investment
plans in the Australian economy. The
proposed Resource Super Profits Tax
creates a substantial amount of sovereign
risk and both the superannuation
industry, which invests Australia’s
superannuation funds, and the Government
should be acutely conscious of the
dangers associated with policies that
add to sovereign risk. |
| |
|
 |
Thursday
6 May 2010
Statement
by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The Australian
Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI),
Australia's largest and most representative
business organisation, has welcomed
the establishment of a new national
automotive industry body – the
Australian Automotive Industry Association.
The new organisation,
established by the Victorian Automobile
Chamber of Commerce, Motor Trades
Associations of Queensland, New South
Wales, and the Tasmanian Automobile
Chamber of Commerce, was launched
in Melbourne today.
“The Australian
automotive industry has a turnover
of $101b a year and employs over 200,000
people. It is not only the backbone
of manufacturing, but supports tens
of thousands of businesses in related
retail, repair and supply industries.
It also invests heavily in workplace
and technical skills.”
“The organisations
behind this new Association have a
long established track record in successfully
representing their member and industry
interests. I am confident that this
spirit will run through the AAIA.”
“ACCI, which
represents industry associations as
well as Chambers, looks forward to
working closely with the new Association
and this vital industry sector.”
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Thursday
6 May 2010
Statement
by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry, Australia's
largest and most representative business
organisation, says that today's arbitration
by Fair Work Australia of minimum
engagement provisions in the retail
industry is a significant test of
whether the new ‘fair work’
industrial relations laws have ‘got
the balance right’ as intended
by the Government.
In this case retail
industry employer organisations, supported
by ACCI, are seeking to vary the minimum
engagement rule in the recently modernised
retail award so that it does not inhibit
the employment of people who can only
work for short shifts.
“The recent
case of young people in regional Victoria
losing their jobs in a country hardware
store because their after-school roster
from 4pm to 5.30 pm (when the store
closed) did not fit the new award
rule is the lightning-rod that must
force a change. This example, plus
others, means that sensible flexibility
should be built into the award rule
prohibiting minimum engagement of
less than three hours so that young
people don't miss out on useful work
that pays award rates.”
ACCI is also today
releasing an Issues Paper on Youth
Employment, which highlights how young
people's employment has become more
vulnerable as a result of the global
financial crisis.
Official ABS data
shows that a quarter of a million
(249,100) young people are currently
unemployed and an additional 304,400
underemployed. 550,000 young people,
or 26.2% of the youth labour force,
are unable to find work or sufficient
work. The Issues Paper concludes that
due to the economic downturn they
have become more vulnerable than before
in seeking work – ‘when
jobs become scare, young job seekers
tend to fare far worse when it comes
to successfully securing employment.’
“Rigid award
rules that created inefficient work
practices or prevented employment
eventually led to deregulation of
the IR system in the early 1990s.
There is a place for minimum engagement
standards, but award rules need to
be flexible to meet business and labour
market needs. If they don't, the system
is discredited and industry calls
for broader change become louder,
especially if it means fewer jobs.”
“The Prime
Minister said in February this year
that this problem would be fixed up.
So far it hasn't been. ACCI and our
retail members have provided the forum
for that to now occur. The sooner
retailers don't have to dismiss staff
because of inflexible award rules,
the better.”
A copy of the ACCI
Issues Paper on Youth Employment is
available at www.acci.asn.au.
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
David Gregory Director
of Workplace Policy 03 9668 9950 /
0417 052 390
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Tuesday 4 May 2010
Statement by Mr Peter Anderson,
Chief Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry has welcomed
today's release by the Government
of exposure draft paid Parental Leave
Bill but expressed caution at the
unnecessary level of administrative
compliance that could be imposed on
employers and small business.
“The Government
Scheme is measured, publicly funded,
and consistent with what is affordable
and necessary for an economy-wide
scheme of this nature. Coupled with
the significant levels of maternity
and paternity leave provided by Australian
employers and the additional social
support through the family tax system
and baby bonus it compares more than
well with international standards.”
While the Government
has endeavored to minimise some of
the administrative costs on employers
and small business through up front
government payments and a 6-month
transition before running the scheme
through employer payrolls, the fact
that employers and small business
will act as paymaster adds an unnecessary
level of red-tape. Businesses together
with the claimant will be in a three
way merry-go-round with the government
agency assessing eligibility, exchanging
information and waiting for correctly
calculated monies to be deposited.
“It would be
simpler and cleaner for the Australian
paid parental leave scheme to be wholly
run through the Government's Family
Assistance Office, as in New Zealand,
rather than having the bureaucracy
receive applications and assess eligibility
but than hand over payment obligations
to the employer.”
“The Government
has not provided any rebate to employers
and small business to cover these
administrative costs. Benefits to
employers are not evenly spread, and
the primary beneficiaries of the Scheme
are employees, not businesses.”
In the United Kingdom
the Government provides 104.5% of
the payment to employers as compensation
for administering the system on behalf
of the State.
ACCI will also support
Commonwealth Government efforts to
have State Governments quarantine
employer payments from payroll tax
and workers’ compensation levies.
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
Tuesday
4 May 2010
Statement by
Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
Reserve Bank interest
rate increases are always difficult
for business and all borrowers across
the economy. Today’s tightening,
will not be welcome news for individual
businesses. With six increases in
eight months, including three successive
rises and a combined 150 basis point
adjustment since October 2009, ACCI
considers that there should now be
a pause before any further rate hikes
in the current cycle.
“Any further
move at this stage in the cycle would
be imprudent without first pausing
to assess the impact of the recent
rate hikes and the strength of the
domestic economy.”
As the Reserve Bank
highlights, today's decision will
leave lending rates for most borrowers
‘around average levels.’
This is especially so for small businesses
who have experienced higher rates
imposed by retail banks. The cash
rate has been returned to a neutral
setting. Any further increase in the
cash rate beyond 4.5% would involve
shifting policy toward a more restrictive
stance.
We are in a period
of economic recovery. However the
robustness of the recovery is still
uneven, and today's Commonwealth Bank
ACCI Business Expectations Survey
shows total sales revenue contracted
for the surveyed firms over the past
three months. Other areas of weakness
include profitability and investment
measures.
A pause in interest
rate increases in the short term will
provide the opportunity to assess
the strength and speed of the recovery
and avoid the potential for denting
confidence and affecting demand conditions
in more vulnerable areas of the economy.
ACCI is cognisant
of needing to address inflationary
pressures as they develop, yet we
consider that the Reserve Bank should
also take account of the pressures
faced in the slower lane of the two
speed economy.
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
Greg Evans Director,
Economics & Industry Policy 02
6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|


|
Tuesday
4 May 2010 Commonwealth
Bank – ACCI Business Expectations
Survey The
May 2010 Commonwealth Bank –
ACCI Business Expectations Survey
has found that all business actual
indicators improved over the March
quarter, except for the index of Sales
Revenue. Nonetheless, most of the
expectations indicators are plateauing
after the strong rebound recorded
in the preceding three quarters.
Despite improvement,
the actual indexes of Export Sales,
Profits and Investment in Building
and Structures remained negative in
the March quarter. Expectations indexes
for these three indicators are in
expansionary territory. Both actual
and expectations indexes of Overtime
Utilisation remained negative, with
hours worked projected to remain unchanged,
if not decline, during the June quarter.
Comparisons by Size
of Firm reveal that small firms have
recorded the weakest performance compared
to medium and large businesses, with
small businesses’ conditions,
employment and investment in plant
and equipment remaining contractionary
during the March quarter.
Mr. Greg
Evans, Director of Economics and Industry
Policy, Australian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry, commented:
While general business
conditions and outlook have improved
over the March quarter, profitability
remains negative and this continues
to hamper to some extent the ability
of business to invest and employ.
Overall, this survey posts a more
positive result, yet there are pressure
points. Nevertheless, we support the
view that the Australian economy will
return to near trend growth by the
end of 2010.
Despite this, some
caution is still warranted as small
businesses, unlike their larger counterparts,
continue to face soft trading conditions
and a lacklustre employment outlook.
Weak selling prices, insufficient
demand and problems associated with
accessing credit remain significant
barriers to sustainable private sector
growth. The likelihood of continued
rate hikes will place further pressure
on those businesses carrying debt
and facing softer sales conditions.
Mr Robert
De Luca, Executive General Manager,
Corporate Financial Services, Commonwealth
Bank, commented:
It’s encouraging
to see that business confidence has
turned a corner, continuing its upward
trend over the March quarter. Business
owners are optimistic that the Australian
economy will not only perform well
over the next quarter, but over the
next 12 months.
Despite improved
confidence, businesses are still finding
that demand for their goods and services
is weak, as more business owners reported
a drop in sales revenue over the past
quarter. Higher wage costs and non-labour
wage costs are also having an impact,
as are rising interest rates.
The survey assessed
business conditions and business confidence
amongst 2,641 businesses around the
country over the January, February
and March period. A full copy of the
Survey is available on the ACCI website
at http://www.acci.asn.au/SurveyBES.htm
For further information:
Greg Evans Director
of Economics and Industry Policy,
ACCI 02 6273 2311 / 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications, ACCI 03 9668 9950
/ 0407 273 884
Kate Powditch Public
Relations, Commonwealth Bank 02 9118
1667
|
| |
|
 |
Monday 3 May
2010
TRANSCRIPT Australian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry
PETER ANDERSON -
ACCI CHIEF EXECUTIVE
The Australian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry indicated yesterday that
the Government response to the Henry
Tax Review is a mixed bag for business,
and indeed it is.
Overnight we have conducted a further
analysis of the impact of some of
the measures on the business community,
both the positive measures, and also
the measures which involve additional
tax obligations on Australia’s
employers and
businesses.
There has been some reporting overnight
that essentially the Government is
funding the increases in superannuation
benefits to Australians through the
proposed resource super tax, which
is projected to raise $9 billion per
year.
Those reports are not correct. The
Government’s funding of increased
superannuation benefits is going to
be paid for by Australia’s one
million employers and small businesses.
Those businesses are going to be required
to increase compulsory superannuation
obligations from 9% to 12% in seven
stages over the next ten years.
Overnight the Australian Chamber of
Commerce and Industry has estimated
that this means an additional cost
to Australian employers of between
$20 billion and $23.6 billion per
year once the full effect of that
measure is put in place by the year
2020. That is a very substantial new
hit on Australian businesses. It is
not funded by the proposed Resource
Super Profits Tax; it is funded by
Australia’s employers and small
businesses. It involves no redistribution
from the resource industry to other
industries or to employees. It also
constitutes a breach of an election
commitment made by the Rudd Government
to the Australian employer community
both before the 2007 election and
immediately following. The Government,
then Opposition, made it very clear
that it did not intend to increase
the 9% employer contribution, and
yet that is what was announced yesterday.
More alarmingly, what was announced
yesterday was not what the Henry Tax
Review recommended. The Henry Tax
Review recommended that employers
should not have to shoulder any increase
in the 9% superannuation contribution.
In those circumstances, Australian
employers will now seek to sit down
with the Government, secure a much
better explanation for why the Government
has taken the action it has taken,
and endeavour to put in place a range
of alternatives
which the Government, and ultimately
the Parliament could consider if it
is proposing that the Superannuation
Guarantee Levy be increased.
It has also been reported this morning
that the changes to company tax are
going to benefit Australia’s
small businesses. That is in part
true, but it is misleading because
the majority of Australia’s
small businesses are indeed not incorporated,
they do not pay tax as companies,
they receive no benefit from the reduction
in the company tax, they pay tax as
individuals and there has been no
reduction in personal income tax in
the Government response to the Henry
Review.
That is the case, regrettably, for
about two thirds of Australia’s
small businesses. The one third who
do benefit from the reduction in company
tax will indeed secure a benefit a
little earlier than other businesses
and that is indeed very welcome.
We expect most small businesses however
to benefit from the sound Government
decisions in respect of depreciation
of assets and asset write offs which
were announced yesterday.
JOURNALIST:
Are you suggesting the Opposition
should vote against these moves?
PETER ANDERSON:
The Opposition and all members of
the Senate in particular, should ask
the very first question: ‘Is
the Government breaching a commitment
that it made to the employer community,
a very significant community in our
economy, in
proposing an increase to the Superannuation
Levy?’ And it should ask the
Government a secondary question: ‘If
the Henry Review did not recommend
that this should occur, then on what
basis has the Government proposed
that it should
occur? On what basis of independent
assessment has the Government come
to the conclusion that employers should
fit this bill, when the Henry Review
recommended that this should not be
the case.’
JOURNALIST:
So do you think it should pass or
not?
PETER ANDERSON:
Well it shouldn’t pass in its
current form. What is required if
the Government is serious about proceeding
with an increase to the Superannuation
Guarantee, is for there to be independent
analysis of whether or not the 9%
employer contribution is adequate.
There is a limited amount of that
material in the Henry Review. There
should then be a completely separate
analysis of how you might deliver
an increase on 9% in a way that is
equitable to all parties concerned.
Employers are being asked to fund
the full burden of every dollar of
the proposed 12% Superannuation Guarantee
Levy. That is not reasonable. There
needs to be a much more equitable
sharing of the burden of savings for
retirement and the
Government has not put in its response
adequate reassurance for industry
that this is going to occur.
The proposal that the Government forecasts
is one that says this can be part
of a wages trade off. That is a matter
that we intend to discuss with Government
and the Senate, but on current indications,
it is not possible for the Government
to deliver the security industry needs
in that regard because we now have
a largely decentralised wages system
and the Government cannot implement
a national economic rule that says
that any superannuation increase has
to be traded off
for a lower wages outcome.
JOURNALIST:
But isn’t that part of the negotiations
that an employer would have with their
employees as a matter of course?
PETER ANDERSON:
Not all employers are involved in
collective bargaining to start with.
Collective bargaining is ultimately
a product of the negotiation between
unions by and large and by employers
of about 50% of the labour force.
Even in that respect, the
Industrial Relations laws of this
country allows collective bargaining
to occur under threat of industrial
action. We saw back in January where
strike action was taken in the Oil
and Gas industry in support of exorbitant
wage demands that ultimately some
employers caved with no trade offs
whatsoever, even though the demands
were exorbitant because of the strike
action. So any negotiation ultimately
can occur under economic coercion
and that is hardly a way to get a
sensible
trade off for superannuation benefits.
JOURNALIST:
These are the same arguments that
were run out in 1993 as the SG was
increased from 3% to 9%, as Paul Keating
suggested it was always going to head
up to 15%. What has changed between
the 1993 and 1999 period to now?
PETER ANDERSON:
Our Industrial Relations system has
changed quite fundamentally. We now
have only about 20% of the Australian
workforce governed by the National
Award System. That is a lower percentage
than was the case in the early nineties
and even in that regard, in the early
nineties the Keating Government did
put in place a requirement that the
Industrial Relations tribunal, when
it assesses award wages, must take
in to account the then proposed superannuation
increases of
3% to 9%. The Government hasn’t
indicated yesterday that it proposes
to amend Industrial Relations laws
in that regard. It certainly needs
to do so, and that will go some way
towards dealing with the issue in
terms of the award wage structure.
But it doesn’t deal with the
fact that in the bargaining regime
there are completely different considerations
that exist. And about 30% of Australia’s
employees, executives, professionals,
managers and the like are not governed
by awards, they
are not governed by collective bargaining
and so there is no mechanism available
to impose a wage trade off for a higher
superannuation payment. |
| |
|
 |
Monday
3 May 2010 Statement
by Mr Peter Anderson, Chief Executive
The Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry, Australia's
largest and most representative business
organisation, has moved to clarify
the exposure employers and small business
have to changes to superannuation
taxation and company taxation in the
Government response to the Henry Tax
Review.
Some media reporting
this morning claims that ‘the
new Resource Super Profits Tax will
fund the Federal Government's promise
to raise the superannuation levy from
9% to 12%.’
Regrettably, this
is not the case:
the increase from
9% to 12% is to be paid by Australia's
one million employers and small businesses.
Overnight ACCI has estimated that
this 3% increase equals, in today's
dollars, between $20 billion and $23.6
billion a year;
the superannuation levy increase is
the biggest new taxing measure in
the Government Response ($20 billion
per year), larger than the Resource
Super Profits Tax (predicted at $9
billion per year);
the Henry Review recommended AGAINST
requiring employers to pay an increase
in the superannuation levy. Last year
the Henry Review released a report
that concluded that the 9% superannuation
levy was adequate for retirement purposes.
The Government has made this decision
off its own back;
the Government decision is a breach
of a promise made to the employer
community prior to and following the
2007 election that it would NOT increase
the compulsory 9% employer contribution;
the Government plan to allow employers
to pay this increase through a wage
trade-off will be difficult to deliver
in what is now a decentralised wage
system. Where it is not part of a
wage trade-off, it is a direct tax
on employers. It is unfair to expect
Australia's employers to bear the
full burden of every dollar of the
compulsory retirement savings of their
employees;
employer superannuation payments already
increase every year as wages rise,
even with no levy increase. Increasing
the levy means employers pay twice
- a higher percentage and higher dollars
as wages rise. The Government plan
to phase this increase in seven steps
over a decade transitions this impact
but does not make an unfair situation
fair.
Some media reporting
this morning also claims that ‘small
businesses will get the benefit of
company tax reductions.’
Regrettably, this
is not correct in the majority of
cases:
the company tax reduction
is only available to incorporated
businesses. Most small businesses
are not incorporated. The Government
response says that there are 2.4 million
small businesses, but that only 720,000
(less than one third) will be eligible
for the company tax reduction;
whereas all employing small businesses
will have to pay the higher superannuation
levy, most small businesses will not
get a company tax cut, but a larger
percentage will benefit from depreciation
and asset write-off changes;
“The Government response to
the Henry Review is a mixed bag for
business. Whatever views are held
on the Government response it is important
that this debate accurately and factually
reflects the impact on industry. Suggestions
that the proposed new tax on the resource
industry is the funding basis for
the rest of the package are only partially
true and likely to mislead. The cost
to employers of higher superannuation
levies is a big hit on the productive
capacity of our economy that was NOT
recommended.”
For further information:
Peter Anderson Chief
Executive 02 6273 2311 / 0417 264
862
Greg Evans Director,
Economics and Industry Policy 02 6273
2311 / 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director
of Communications 03 9668 9950 / 0407
273 884
|
| |
|
 |
2 May
2010
The Henry review
into Australia’s Future Tax
System makes an historic and significant
contribution to the economic reform
debate in Australia.
“As a staunch
advocate for root-and-branch reform
of Australia’s tax system, the
BCA strongly supports the ambitious
nature of the review panel’s
blueprint,” Ms Lahey said.
“The government’s
initial response to the review is
a step in the right direction although
it is confined to a relatively narrow
set of areas and only partially meets
the BCA’s principles for tax
reform. We hope over time the government
will embrace the recommendations of
the Henry review more fully, given
they could add a further 2 per cent
to GDP.”
Read the full statement
here:
http://www.bca.com.au/Content/101681.aspx
For further information, visit our
website at www.bca.com.au.
To provide
feedback or unsubscribe to the BCA
email distribution list, please click
here.
|
| |
|
 |
2nd
May 2010
Statement by Mr Peter
Anderson, Chief Executive
The Australian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry, Australia’s largest
and most representative business organisation,
says that the Government Response
to the Henry Tax Review is a mixed
bag for the business community with
welcome steps towards a lower corporate
tax rate and small business concessions
on depreciation cancelled out by tax
hikes on employer superannuation and
a new tax on the resources industry.
“There is tax
reform in the package, but it is not
bold reform and there are missed opportunities,
the biggest of which is the failure
to act on a breakthrough recommendation
by the Henry Tax Review that payroll
tax should be abolished.”
“Payroll tax
is an inefficient and job destroying
tax on employment and exports without
reference to capacity to pay, and
the Henry Review has at last said
it should go. The government must
now start dialogue with the States
through COAG on a plan to replace
it once and for all.”
The decision to increase
employer superannuation payments from
9% to 12% in seven increments over
a decade is in direct conflict with
the Henry Review.
“Since the
Henry Review did not recommend it,
it is foolish of the Government to
go ahead and push the 9% employer
tax higher, especially since it breaches
the government’s 2007 commitment
to the business community.”
It is also unnecessary.
The Henry Review in May 2009 released
a Retirement Income Report which said
“the superannuation guarantee
should remain at 9%…the panel
considers the rate of compulsory saving
to be adequate.”
ACCI opposes this
increase, especially in the form proposed.
The government idea of funding it
through a wage trade off is worthy,
but unlikely to work in a decentralised
wage system. Funding retirement incomes
of employees should not be a burden
business is asked to carry alone.
The reduction in
the company tax rate from 30% to 28%
will be positive for economic growth
and encourage greater investment.
However, the failure to reduce personal
income tax is a missed opportunity,
given that a large portion of small
businesses are unincorporated and
do not benefit from a cut in company
tax.
ACCI welcomes the
simplified and more generous depreciation
allowances for assets valued at less
than $5,000. These changes will partially
alleviate cash flow pressures, and
will provide a net benefit to small
business. The Henry Review recommended
the depreciation benefit should extend
to assets up to $10,000 in value.
This should be the longer term reform
goal.
The proposal to move
to single pool depreciation for all
other assets, except buildings, also
represents a significant benefit to
small business and will lead to a
reduction in the compliance burden
associated with the administration
of tax affairs.
Despite these first
steps in tax reform, there remain
important elements of the tax system
that business identifies as priorities
that have not been addressed at this
stage.
Business looks forward
to future discussion in the following
areas which are fundamental to meaningful
and comprehensive tax reform. Specifically:
• reductions
in personal income tax rates;
• capital gains tax relief for
business;
• the abolition of payroll tax;
and
• proposals to reform inefficient
state transaction taxes.
ACCI is concerned
the reforms nominated today singularly
rely on the introduction of the Resource
Super Profits Tax. The minerals sector
is globally exposed and vulnerable
to large swings in prices and to changes
in supply arrangements. It is not
clear how the proposed arrangements
may affect investment intentions in
the sector and the economics of future
projects. Funding tax reform should
also focus on achieving reductions
in spending rather than just relying
on a new revenue stream.
If we are to reform
our tax system, today’s release
of the Henry Tax Review and the Government’s
response must be seen as only a first
step. ACCI and business organisations
look forward to constructive engagement
with the government and community
on these and other changes.
For further
information:
Peter Anderson Chief Executive 0417
264 862
Greg Evans Director of Economics and
Industry Policy 0407 204 559
Brett Hogan Director of Communications
0407 273 884
|
| |
|
 |
1
January 2010 The
highly anticipated redevelopment of
Chatswood Mall is set to commence
on Monday 15 February 2010. The upgrades
will see Chatswood Mall rejuvenated
into a modern and vibrant café
and retail promenade offering more
dining space, outdoor seating and
areas for events and entertainment.
The construction
works will be undertaken in stages
to maintain public thoroughfare and
access to the shops and services located
in Chatswood Mall throughout the 10
month construction period.
The final design,
which was developed following extensive
community consultation, will significantly
improve pedestrian circulation and
increase the versatility of the space
through the creation of a central
avenue which will accommodate footway
dining, market stalls and public seating.
The new and exciting
Chatswood Mall design will feature
a central spine formed by a row of
deciduous Chinese Elms which will
form a natural canopy above seated
areas providing shade in the warmer
months and allowing winter sun through.
Classic high quality
materials such as granite paving and
hardwood will be combined with detailed
pavers and public art providing a
cohesive and interactive design that
will both inspire and ensure the mall’s
longevity.
“The Chatswood
Mall is the backbone of the Chatswood
CBD supporting more than 30 000 daily
users,” said Willoughby Mayor
Pat Reilly. “The much needed
redevelopment works will ensure Chatswood
Mall will retain a clean and contemporary
appearance and will transform Chatswood’s
principal gateway into a vibrant and
flexible public space by day and night,”
he said.
Visit www.willoughby.nsw.gov.au
or phone 9777 1000 for more information.
|
| |
|
| |
[ return
to top of page ] |
|
` |
|
|
|